Collective Engagement - a new "City Club" for institutions?

The Kay Review advocated the setting up of a mechanism whereby institutional investors could engage better with public companies. This was seen as a way to improve understanding between investors and companies, to encourage more long-term thinking, to enable debate on strategic options and to tackle such problems as excessive pay.

A first step has been the setting up of a “Collective Engagement Working Group” under the Chairmanship of James Anderson of Baillie Gifford. It has produced a report on how such a forum would operate which can be obtained from here: http://www.investmentfunds.org.uk/current-topics-of-interest/investor-forum

It is focussed on how asset managers and asset owners can achieve a “deep cultural change” as the report puts it. It says “In order to establish this, companies must be confident that asset managers and owners prefer to be supportive rather than critical. We must be consistently engaged rather than occasionally outraged“.

All fine words, but lets look at some of the practical issues they have faced. The first problem is that institutional investors are now typically very fragmented (in large public companies it is unusual for any one investor to hold more than 3% of the equity), and in addition the majority are now overseas based. It is not clear how members of the Forum are to be selected or whether it’s going to be just a few of the larger UK institutions who are active in corporate governance.

But the concept is to create a Forum with a “skeleton” secretariat. It is proposed that only asset managers and asset owners would be included in the Forum (not industry representative bodies such as the ABI, NAPF, etc.). And note that no private investors will be represented even though in total such investors usually own a lot more of a company than any individual institutional investor.

When a problem company or issue is identified, an “Engagement Action Group” will be created of those investors interested and such a Group will then try to engage with the company concerned. One question raised is whether the “secretariat” should disseminate their knowledge of an issue more widely and to whom – there is no answer provided.

One of the difficult aspects of such engagement is the legal problem of the members of the Engagement Action Groups potentially becoming insiders. it is proposed that the Forum engage a legal advisor to handle these problems and Forum participants (and presumably Engagement Action Group” members) are not made insiders by access to price sensitive information or by decisions to take particular action. How the proposals will avoid problems in this area are not at all clear – all the document says is that there will need to be discussions with the FCA to ensure there are no concerns there.

It is also proposed that Companies should have an “annual strategy meeting” for institutional investors to which no third parties such as analysts or brokers (and presumably smaller investors) are invited. Presentations given at such meeting may be published, but it seems clear that otherwise the questions and answers will be kept secret.

Comment: One must welcome this attempt to improve the oversight of public companies by investors. However, they have sidestepped a lot of the legal and moral issues of a small group of investors having access to information that is not widely known. They suggest that Forum members can avoid becoming insiders but that really is nonsensical. For example, if the issue is that investors lack confidence in the Chairman or Chief Executive of a company, and are seeking changes, how can that possibly be considered non price sensitive? In essence they are trying to “square the circle” where it is proposed that companies can be influenced by Forum members without them becoming insiders.

The report also suggests that a kind of cosy relationship can be established by the Forum with company boards where mutual understanding will solve problems. But the Local Authority Pension Fund Forum (LAPFF) quickly issued a press release after the Working Group report was published effectively indicating they were not happy with the proposals and stating that “Shareholder engagement must also deal with the more immediate agenda such as incompetent directors, excessive and unjustified pay, neglected shareholder rights and short-term decisions not in shareholders long-term economic interests. It’s not just about ‘building trust’, it’s also about challenge – something UK institutions have been poor at“. Very well put indeed.

The LAPFF also indicated that they believed governance control should be in the hands of asset owners rather than asset managers (presumably because the latter are more likely to be sympathetic to the interests of company directors – for example, the report makes clear that “routine remuneration matters will not be a core focus of the Forum” so they will only intervene if they become strategic questions). The LAPFF will be publishing its own proposals.

This author agrees with the LAPFF that this looks much too much like the creation of a cosy club of a few institutional investors who will be pretending not to be insiders when they effectively are. The lack of public disclosure and access by other investors to the information disclosed in meetings to “Engagement Action Groups” will create a slanted playing field in what should be open public markets. This is surely not the way to move this forward.

ShareSoc is considering making representations to this Working Group and to Government Ministers on this subject so if you have any views on this topic, please let us know.

Roger Lawson

Post Date: December 9, 2013

Group description:	Our group is interested in sustainable investing and our goal is to identify and evaluate businesses that will thrive through innovation and their transition to a ‘One Planet Economy’. By leveraging the skills of group members, we aim to deeply understand these businesses, particularly focusing on how they develop long-term valuable benefits for their customers. Each year, we plan to evaluate around seven businesses to identify opportunities where our valuation exceeds the market price. A successful outcome is defined as achieving a compound annual growth rate (CAGR), including dividends, of 10% over a decade.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Meetings are in-person in a pub near to Waterloo station in London.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	Meetings are bi-monthly on a Monday from 10:45am to 4:30pm. Members are expected to also pay for their own lunch which secures the group free use of a private room in the pub. The cost is expected to be £35-40 per person, per meeting, in addition to your SIGnet membership fee.

Group description:	SIGnet Taunton is a new group with around 10 keen members at present, with a range of investment styles and experience. We welcome new members.
Meeting Type/Venue:	In person meetings at a golf club near to the centre of Taunton.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	We meet on the first Monday of every month at a golf club near to the centre of Taunton, 11am until 3pm with a lunch break.

Group description:	An online group for those who are new to investing, or have only been investing for a few years. Including topics such as: – What is a share or a bond, why and how to buy them. – Comparing funds, unit trusts, Investment trusts and exchange traded funds. – Portfolio management and diversification. – ISAs, pensions, SIPPS and how to save tax. – How terms such as PE ratio and dividend yield are used to value a share. – How to use technical analysis or charting.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Online using Zoom.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	Meetings are usually held on the last Monday of the month at 7:00pm.

Group description:	An online group for those who already have some experience in investing. Covering topics such as finding companies to invest in, financial statements and ratios, valuation / margin of safety, analysis of companies and investment trusts and exchange traded funds.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Online using Zoom.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	Meetings are usually held on the last Wednesday of the month at 7:00pm.

Group description:	The Equity Income Group welcomes investors of all levels of experience, from beginners to advanced. The focus of meetings is on dividend paying Investment Trusts, though there is also discussion around individual shares.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Meetings are held online.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	Meetings are held every 6 weeks on a weekday between 7 and 8:30pm.

Collective Engagement – a new “City Club” for institutions?

Leave a Comment Click here to cancel reply.

Group description:	All levels of experience welcome. A typical meeting agenda includes: – Macro Environment – Trades: Members review existing positions and identify securities with promising TA entry patterns or setups and with suitable risk/reward. Any security, long, short, futures, options may be considered. The convener takes actual positions in trades and maintains his own detailed ledger, accurately measuring performance of individual securities and cumulative activity. Members are notified by e-mail prior to the entries or exits that are decided upon. Following each meeting an updated copy of the ledger is circulated together with the next meeting agenda. Members may wish to maintain similar ledgers of their own but there is no obligation to do so. – Technical Analysis: Techniques and systems used in trades. Members can request discussion of particular aspects of TA.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Online via Zoom
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	The first Tuesday of every month from 7 to 9pm

Group description:	Open to all investors / people with an interest in investing. Typical meeting will involve members talking about recent purchases, successes, failures and possible future purchases. Also with occasional visiting speakers or members making presentations on a topic of interest.
Meeting Type/Venue:	We aim to meet on the last Tuesday of each month in a private room at a pub in Playhatch. Start time 7pm with members encouraged to meet up around 6pm for a bite to eat / drink before hand, if their diaries allow.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	7pm on the last Tuesday of the month. Meetings likely to last about two hours but with informal ‘overspill’ before / after.

Group description:	Group focused on active investing, primarily in small / medium cap UK equities.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Regular Zoom meetings interspersed with occasional face to face meetings and social activities in the North West.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	Monthly on Saturdays at 10am.

Group description:	Our group covers a wide spectrum of mainly stock market investing and trading from equities – which include shares, ETF’s Investment and Unit Trusts. We normally rotate the meeting chairperson (responsible for creating, with member’s help, suitable agendas) and a meeting presenter (members take it in turns to provide a 15 to 45 minute presentation on a subject of their choice). Various investing topics of interest are regularly discussed such as software, brokers, investing categories and markets and any related topics of interest.
Meeting Type/Venue:	Meetings will be returning to in-person in a private room at a West London golf club, close to an underground station. In the meantime monthly video calls and an in-between meeting email group will continue.
Meeting Frequency/Timing:	In-person meetings will be held on the second Wednesday of each month in the afternoons, following a golf club one course lunch.